Burqa Ban in Switzerland Muslim Woman Fined for Face Covering

Burqa Ban in Switzerland Muslim Woman Fined for Face Covering

Switzerland recently fined a Muslim woman 100 Swiss francs for wearing a burqa in public, marking the first enforcement of the country’s new “burqa ban” law.

This legislation, which took effect on January 1, 2025, prohibits individuals from covering their faces in public spaces, except for health, safety, weather, or traditional customs.

Practically no one in Switzerland wears a burqa and only about 30 women wear the niqab [File: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP]

Burqa Ban in Switzerland Muslim Woman Fined for Face Covering

Police in Zürich intercepted the woman after she refused to uncover her face, which she kept covered for religious reasons. Because she declined to pay the fine, the authorities referred the case to the cantonal administration for further legal steps.

The law imposes an initial administrative fine of 100 Swiss francs to minimize bureaucracy. However, if individuals contest the fine, it can increase to 1,000 Swiss francs.

In a 2021 referendum, 51.2% of voters narrowly approved the ban. The right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) led the campaign, claiming that face coverings hinder social integration and security while promoting equality.

Muslim organizations and other critics describe the law as discriminatory and argue that it infringes on individual freedoms.

European countries with similar burqa bans

Several European countries have implemented burqa bans or restrictions on face coverings in public spaces. Here is a list of countries with similar laws:

Countries with Full or Partial Burqa Bans:

Austria banned face-covering clothing in 2017 to ensure security and promote integration.
Belgium introduced a ban on burqas and full-face veils in 2015, citing public safety and social integration concerns.
Bulgaria implemented a partial ban on burqas in public spaces in 2016 to enhance security and social cohesion.
Denmark banned burqas and face coverings in public in 2018 to improve public safety and integration.
France prohibited full-face veils in public spaces in 2011, claiming it violates secular laws.
Netherlands enacted a partial ban on face coverings in public places like schools, hospitals, and public transport.
Italy banned burqas in certain localities to foster integration and uphold public safety.
Spain implemented bans in some parts of Catalonia, citing security and gender equality concerns.
Germany introduced partial bans in schools and public spaces in some states.
Switzerland banned burqas and other face coverings nationwide from January 1, 2025.
Norway restricted face veils in nurseries, schools, and universities.
Kosovo banned face coverings in public schools.
Bosnia and Herzegovina prohibited face coverings in courts and legal institutions.

Governments usually justify these bans by citing concerns about security, social integration, and gender equality. However, these laws remain controversial and often face criticism for targeting Muslim minorities.

Main Arguments Against the Burqa Ban in Switzerland

Critics focus on several key issues related to religious freedom, individual rights, and social cohesion:

Violation of Religious Freedom

Opponents argue that the ban infringes on the fundamental right to religious expression, as guaranteed by international human rights conventions.

This photograph taken in Geneva shows two campaign posters, one in favour of a ‘burqa ban’, left, reading in French: ‘Stop Radical Islamism!’ and the other against a free trade agreement with Indonesia reading in French: ‘Stop palm oil! No to the free trade agreement with Indonesia’ [Fabrice Coffrini/AFP]

They claim the law disproportionately targets Muslim women who wear the burqa or niqab for religious reasons, marginalizing a small minority group.

Discrimination and Islamophobia

Critics say the ban reinforces Islamophobia and institutionalizes discrimination against Muslims. They believe the law stigmatizes Islamic symbols and excludes Muslims from Swiss society.

Campaigns supporting the ban often displayed Islamophobic imagery, such as posters portraying women in niqabs with threatening slogans.

Limited Practical Relevance

Opponents highlight that only about 30 women in Switzerland wear the burqa or niqab, making the ban largely symbolic rather than practical. They claim the law exaggerates a minor issue while targeting a vulnerable minority.

Gender Equality Concerns

Supporters of the ban claim it liberates women, but critics argue that it actually restricts women’s choices and autonomy. Muslim feminist groups describe the law as sexist and racist because it imposes state control over how women dress under the guise of protecting them.

Hypocrisy in Public Health Context

Critics point out the irony of banning face coverings shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic, when the government required face masks for health reasons. They claim this inconsistency undermines arguments about security and public interaction.

Erosion of Direct Democracy

Some argue that using direct democracy to pass such laws allows populist agendas to target minorities. Critics say right-wing groups like the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) exploited democratic mechanisms to institutionalize exclusionary policies.

Muslim organizations claim the ban deepens feelings of exclusion among Muslims in Switzerland. The Central Council of Muslims described the decision as “a dark day” for Muslims, stating that it expands legal inequality and sends a clear signal of exclusion.

Many Muslims feel insulted and marginalized, especially since the campaign supporting the ban often depicted them negatively and reinforced harmful stereotypes.

Share This Post: